1. Model 3 is coming. Get your Model 3 Owners Club apparel today!


    Dismiss Notice

One Battery Pack Justification

Discussion in 'Tech Talk' started by patrick0101, Apr 17, 2017.

More threads by patrick0101
  1. patrick0101

    Active Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    8
    City & State/Province:
    USA
    Tesla Owner:
    Model X
    Country:
    Country
    What do you think about the idea that Tesla could/should only make the large battery pack (70 or 75 kWh) and then SW limit it for the smaller pack?

    One Battery Pack Justification
     
  2. Michael Russo

    Top-Contributor
    Moderator
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Messages:
    3,818
    Likes Received:
    2,340
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    Pau, France
    Tesla Owner:
    Reservation
    Country:
    Country
    It is certainly a perspective, and some of the arguments do kind of hold water, yet the view amongst those here who know 'stuff' (which does not include me, of course... :D) is that, with the relative cost of batteries, this otherwise attractive option is unlikely to materialize...

    Does the new 2170 change that, and to what extent? Mystery... :)

    In the end, we will only know for sure in a couple of months... ;)
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. garsh

    Dis Member
    Moderator M3OC Supporting Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    3,083
    Likes Received:
    1,738
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    Pittsburgh PA
    Country:
    Country
    Batteries are still the most expensive part of a car, even with all of the cost reductions Tesla is implementing. They won't be able to do software limited batteries & still make good profits (if any at all) on a base $35,000 Model 3.

    As another indicator, Tesla has done away with the software-limited battery option for Model S. It appears to have been a temporary, stop-gap measure to offer a vehicle option at a lower price point.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. patrick0101

    Active Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    8
    City & State/Province:
    USA
    Tesla Owner:
    Model X
    Country:
    Country
    I agree. The math only works if you can assume that a significant percentage of people will upgrade, which is, of course, unknown for Model 3 buyers.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. patrick0101

    Active Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    8
    City & State/Province:
    USA
    Tesla Owner:
    Model X
    Country:
    Country
    If you ever figure out how to join that club, please let me know :)
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  6. BigBri

    Top-Contributor
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2016
    Messages:
    537
    Likes Received:
    410
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    Toronto, Ontario
    Country:
    Country
    I don't think we'll see that again. You can't sell someone a house and lock a bedroom door hoping they will eventually want it and pay a premium. Tesla could do it on the S as its a lower volume car. With something like the Model3 we'd be talking about unused cells that could potentially make complete packs for thousands and thousands of cars. Even with a Gigafactory or two chances are the batteries will continue to be the bottleneck in production. It's why I suspect we'll not be seeing much bigger then 100KWH packs for a long time. Even when it's possible they'd rather get 3 cars with smaller packs on the road then 1 with a huge one.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. Bobby Garrity

    Active Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2017
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    North Massapequa, NY
    Country:
    Country
    I think it makes more sense to software lock one option out of four than one option out of two. Not making the 60kWh packs on the S probably helped simplified production, but for the 3, production will be plenty simplified if they are only making two packs across 500,000 cars a year.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. 3Victoria

    Active Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2016
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    96
    Trophy Points:
    28
    City & State/Province:
    Victoria
    Guess is that the latest upgrade from 60-->75 is $133/kWh, so 55-->75 would be on order of $2500. It would seem that that might allow locked 55s.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  9. AEDennis

    Top-Contributor
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2016
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    63
    City & State/Province:
    Southern California, Most of the time...
    Country:
    Country
    Never say never...

    Tesla first produced this option with the 40/60 Model S... With the 40 disappearing quickly...

    They did it again with 70/75 and 60/75... I think they may also have done this with some P85D/P90D... But unsure.

    Would they do it for the 3? I would bet against it, but then again, I've lost many bets before, so...
     
    • Like Like x 2
  10. Badback

    Valued Community Member
    M3OC Supporting Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2016
    Messages:
    1,100
    Likes Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    Prior Lake, MN
    Tesla Owner:
    Reservation
    Country:
    Country
    A software locked larger battery reduces range as you still have the weight of the larger battery without the energy.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. TrevP

    M3OC Founder / Administrator
    Founder M3OC Supporting Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2016
    Messages:
    5,187
    Likes Received:
    2,841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    Aurora,Ontario
    Tesla Owner:
    Reservation
    Country:
    Country
    There's nothing stopping them other than profit margins. You can do this on a high priced Model S but in a car at half the cost...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. 3Victoria

    Active Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2016
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    96
    Trophy Points:
    28
    City & State/Province:
    Victoria
    Yes, that is true. However, there are compensating advantages: can charge to 100% without detriment; faster charging; and can upgrade over the air when wanted.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. Topher

    Energy Curmudgeon
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    197
    Trophy Points:
    43
    City & State/Province:
    Maine
    Tesla Owner:
    Reservation
    Country:
    Country
    More evidence is that they are fire sale pricing the upgrade on the 60S. They could want the whole mess off their books.

    Thank you kindly.
     
  14. SoFlaModel3

    Impatiently Waiting
    Moderator M3OC Supporting Member
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2017
    Messages:
    3,364
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    South Florida
    Tesla Owner:
    Reservation
    Country:
    Country
    You have to take a step back and think about the clientele difference.

    On a Model 3, there are not going to be many people that have cash sitting around to add range to their car let alone adding auto pilot after the fact.

    I think this is an interesting, but bad play on the 3.

    Presumably most will finance or lease and by that logic, most that want a bigger battery will have it factored into their lease or financing rather than paying for it outright down the road.

    I know this thread isn't about autopilot, but I do see that differently as an evolving software over time. There is a play for a subscription type model as a possibility. I don't see that as a remote possibility for a battery though.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. arnis

    Top-Contributor
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2017
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    125
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    near Tallinn
    Country:
    Country
    I think it is a bad idea. Many reasons are already listed.
    I'll add one more: SW limited pack still weights the same. Therefore
    with 55kWh limited 75kWh pack range will be smaller than with 55kWh pack.
    Overall small pack demand will be similar to big pack demand.

    I think they will have 8 and 6 module variations for Model 3.
    If they are clever, they will have modules wired to be 50V
    and others slightly higher (more cells in series per module).
     
  16. Red Sage

    The Cybernetic Samurai
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Messages:
    698
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    City & State/Province:
    Los Angeles CA
    Country:
    Country
    I've argued in favor of both positions. At this point, I'm really concerned both by the report that Model ☰ would offer a less than 60 kWh capacity version, and that Elon Musk said the maximum would be 75 kWh. I'm hoping for a surprise that offers... more.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2

Share This Page

Model 3 Owners Club © 2017. All rights reserved.
Model 3 Owners Club (M3OC) is an enthusiast club and is not affiliated with Tesla Motors or the Tesla Motors Club Forum (TMC).
All Tesla logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Tesla Motors.